Many companies featured on Money advertise with us. Opinions are our own, but compensation and
in-depth research may determine where and how companies appear. Learn more about how we make money.

Money is not a client of any investment adviser featured on this page. The information provided on this page is for educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Money does not offer advisory services.

Of the nudity that was so prevalent at Woodstock, Dominis says that  it all felt pretty natural. But I didn't shoot very many. I shot a few, but mostly men. I didn't like the idea of sneaking around behind a tree taking pictures of nude teenage girls. But then, when I think about it now, they probably wouldn't have minded if I'd just walked right in and taken pictures.
Of the nudity that was so prevalent at Woodstock, Dominis says that "it all felt pretty natural. But I didn't shoot very many. I shot a few, but mostly men. I didn't like the idea of sneaking around behind a tree taking pictures of nude teenage girls. But then, when I think about it now, they probably wouldn't have minded if I'd just walked right in and taken pictures."
Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images

After more than 30 years, the 401(k) has become our de facto national retirement savings plan. So how is it that most participants can't build a portfolio out of the best, cheapest investments around -- index funds?

In 2013 this should not be an issue. Decades of studies have shown that funds that simply track market benchmarks outperform actively managed funds over the long run because of the huge difference in fees -- a typical 401(k) stock index fund may charge 0.06% of assets, vs. 0.63% for the average fund run by a manager who picks equities.

Assuming a 7% annualized return before expenses over 25 years, that fee difference can mean a 9% bigger nest egg.

The unhappy status quo exists in part because regulators are loath to demand that specific investments be included in 401(k) plans. And in designing plans, employers rely on consultants and fund groups, which have an incentive to favor higher-cost offerings.

Today most 401(k)s offer a single index option that usually invests in large stocks like those in the S&P 500. Only 42% of plans with indexing include an intermediate bond fund, and just 31% have a foreign-stock fund, according to consultants Aon Hewitt.

Even at index king Vanguard, "only about four out of 10 plans we manage offer enough index funds to build a core portfolio," says Steve Utkus, head of Vanguard's center for retirement research.

What can you do if your plan lacks index funds? Start by lobbying your employer -- new rules require 401(k)s to disclose fees, which may nudge your boss in the right direction. Meanwhile, here are three coping strategies:

Check out your plan's target date fund. Even if you lack enough standalone index options, your target-date fund, a mix of portfolios designed to grow conservative as you near retirement, may have them.

Vanguard's index target series has been pulling in the most cash, $20 billion in 2012, according to Morningstar. Now Fidelity, Wells Fargo, and BlackRock have all-index offerings that provide enough diversification for you to be able to use them as your core holding.

Opt for low-cost active funds. Otherwise, make the best of your options. Look for the cheapest fund in each market segment you want to invest in.

"Owning more actively managed funds within an asset class means you're more likely to lag your benchmark," says Portfolio Solutions adviser Rick Ferri, who has studied the benefits of indexing over active portfolios.

Index outside your 401(k). If you're stuck with high-cost stock funds charging near 2%, or bond funds charging half that, invest enough to get your employer's match. Then fund a Roth IRA or taxable account, buying stock index funds that generate little in capital gains. You'll end up with a larger nest egg, a goal your employer should want to share.