---
title: How Audi and Tecate Won the Presidential Debate
description: Lots of advertisers and brands prefer to steer clear of politics. But last night’s event was so widely hyped that some marketers simply couldn’t resist.
authors:
  - name: Rob Walker
    url: https://money.com/author/rob-walker/
    at_money_since: 2015
    articles: 2
    covers:
      - Housing
      - Personal Finance
    former_staff: true
published: '2016-09-27T14:50:10.000Z'
modified: '2024-04-17T03:55:14.000Z'
section: Economy and Politics
tags:
  - Advertising
  - Election 2016
word_count: 713
canonical: https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/
type: Article
source: structured-blocks
---

> **Disclosure:** We research all brands listed and may earn a fee from our partners. Research and financial considerations may influence how brands are displayed. Not all brands are included. [Learn more](https://money.com/page/disclaimer/).

![160926_EM_DebateAds2](https://img.money.com/2016/09/160926_em_debateads2.jpg)

It’s rare to crave a commercial break. But if 95 uninterrupted minutes of the first, bruising 2016 presidential debate had at least some viewers (not to mention two candidates and a moderator) yearning for the relief of a word from a sponsor or two, it wouldn’t surprise me.

The rules set by the nonpartisan, nonprofit Commission on Presidential Debates [specify](http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2016debates) that (unlike primary face-offs), these events unfold “without commercial breaks.” And generally speaking, lots of advertisers and brands prefer to steer clear of politics anyway. But last night’s event was so widely hyped — predictions of 100 million viewers were made — that some marketers simply couldn’t resist the spectacle. Networks were thus [reportedly](https://money.com/presidential-election-debate-ad-costs/) asking $200,000 or more for 30-second slots immediately before or after the debate.

And notably, a few ad-makers decided to play politics — or, at least, play *with* politics.

Two such spots stand out. The bolder one came from, of all things, Tecate. It starts with a bird’s-eye view of the U.S./Mexican border, with an announcer gravely informing us: “The time has come … for a wall. A tremendous wall. The best wall.” Gradually we zoom in on two groups of guys, regarding each other from across the border. Next we see the wall.

[Watch video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bev4NZEFsCQ)

Then, abruptly, somebody whaps a can of Tecate onto the thing — and the “tremendous wall” turns out to be about the height of a cooler, and thus a perfect accessory for sharing some brews, or cerveza, or whatever you want to call cans of Tecate and Tecate Light. It is, in sum, a wall that “brings us together,” the announcer concludes. “You’re welcome, America.”

Tecate reps [insist](http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/debate-ad-tecate-turns-trump-s-wall-a-beer-prop/305999/) the brand (which traces its roots to the town of Tecate, Mexico, near where the ad was filmed, and is today owned Heineken), is “totally neutral” on political matters. But it’s pretty hard to imagine how this goes down as anything but a poke at Donald Trump’s signature issue, converting the Republican candidate’s imagined mega-barrier into a cross-cultural party spot. This is [reportedly](http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/tecate-will-ambush-tonights-debate-trump-mocking-ad-about-building-beer-wall-173708) Tecate’s first ad explicitly aiming beyond its core Hispanic market to more general audience, so while I think it’s clever and charming, it’ll be interesting to see what sort of taste it leaves in the mouths of the “Build That Wall” crowd.

<!-- omitted unsupported block: gallery -->

The other notable ad is more of a high-production-value blockbuster, from Audi. Clocking in at a minute-and-a-half, it opens with a close-up of “Vote” and “2016” buttons, on a debris-covered floor. Then the spot, titled “Duel,” rapidly accelerates into a full-on brawl between a man and a woman — which, when I saw it during a post-debate segment on CBS, seemed like déjà vu.

Oddly, the action unspools *backwards.* But this is one intense fight, reminiscent of “War of the Roses,” and ranging from a ballroom where some sort of political celebration was planned through various parts of a hotel. At one point the woman’s head smashes through a wall into a room where a startled couple was watching a debate; at another moment someone drops a smartphone with a “Confidential” message visible on its screen; and in the hotel kitchen, a guy walks by with a taco bowl much like the one Trump famously [tweeted](https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/728297587418247168?lang=en).

[Watch video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dir0cOFmrOM)

The fight itself is a humdinger worthy of an action film. In the end, we learn that the two are valets, and the whole thing started over who would get to park a new Audi.

Fun. But that payoff is really a head fake. The ad closes with text: “Beautiful things are worth fighting for. Choose the next driver wisely.” Those slightly cryptic lines, paired with the in-reverse narrative and all the Easter egg political references (which of course encourage repeat views), are what the ad is really about. Beyond that, the specifics are rather cunningly up to you. Should we behold today’s political brawls and wonder what it was that started this mess? Or which punch or kick or hair pull escalated it beyond control? Is it even possible to choose “wisely” at this point? Or maybe those interpretations are too cynical. Let’s just hope the “beautiful thing” we’re fighting for is something more significant than a new Audi — and that when this duel concludes, it’s possible to clean up the wreckage.

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "@id": "https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/#breadcrumb",
      "itemListElement": [
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 1,
          "name": "Home",
          "item": "https://money.com"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 2,
          "name": "Economy and Politics",
          "item": "https://money.com/economy-and-politics/"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 3,
          "name": "Elections",
          "item": "https://money.com/elections/"
        },
        {
          "@type": "ListItem",
          "position": 4,
          "name": "How Audi and Tecate Won the Presidential Debate"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@type": "WebSite",
      "@id": "https://money.com/#website",
      "url": "https://money.com",
      "name": "Money",
      "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://money.com/#organization"
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "WebPage",
      "@id": "https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/#webpage",
      "url": "https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/",
      "name": "How Audi and Tecate Won the Presidential Debate",
      "isPartOf": {
        "@id": "https://money.com/#website"
      },
      "datePublished": "2016-09-27T14:50:10.000Z",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@id": "https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/"
      },
      "inLanguage": "en-US",
      "breadcrumb": {
        "@id": "https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/#breadcrumb"
      },
      "dateModified": "2024-04-17T03:55:14.000Z"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Article",
      "headline": "How Audi and Tecate Won the Presidential Debate",
      "articleSection": "Economy and Politics",
      "image": [
        {
          "@type": "ImageObject",
          "url": "https://img.money.com/2016/09/160926_em_debateads2.jpg",
          "width": 2100,
          "height": 1181,
          "caption": "160926_EM_DebateAds2"
        }
      ],
      "author": [
        {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Rob Walker",
          "url": "https://money.com/author/rob-walker/",
          "@id": "https://money.com/author/rob-walker/#author"
        }
      ],
      "publisher": "https://money.com/#organization",
      "datePublished": "2016-09-27T14:50:10.000Z",
      "description": "Lots of advertisers and brands prefer to steer clear of politics. But last night’s event was so widely hyped that some marketers simply couldn’t resist.",
      "abstract": "Lots of advertisers and brands prefer to steer clear of politics. But last night’s event was so widely hyped that some marketers simply couldn’t resist.",
      "@id": "https://money.com/presidential-debate-television-ads-commercials/",
      "inLanguage": "en-US",
      "dateModified": "2024-04-17T03:55:14.000Z",
      "wordCount": 713,
      "keywords": [
        "Advertising",
        "Election 2016"
      ],
      "about": [
        {
          "@type": "Thing",
          "name": "Political economy",
          "sameAs": [
            "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_economy"
          ]
        },
        {
          "@type": "Thing",
          "name": "Election",
          "sameAs": [
            "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election"
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
```
