--- title: State GMO Labeling Laws Can Remain in Place description: The Senate voted against a bill that would have stopped states from mandating GMO labeling on food. authors: - name: Martha C. White role: Writer url: https://money.com/author/martha-c-white/ education: BA, English, Princeton University at_money_since: 2015 articles: 350 covers: - Economy and Politics - Banking - Business - Career Advice - Credit - Credit Cards - Debt - Education - Federal Reserve Rate Cuts - Health and Wellness - Housing - Identity Theft - Insurance - Investing - Lifestyle - Loans - Mortgages - Personal Finance - Professional Services - Retirement - Shopping - Taxes - Technology published: '2016-03-16T20:26:21.000Z' modified: '2016-03-16T20:26:21.000Z' section: Economy and Politics tags: - food label - food labeling - GMO - gmo foods - GMOs - pubdesk word_count: 292 canonical: https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/ type: Article source: structured-blocks --- > **Disclosure:** We research all brands listed and may earn a fee from our partners. Research and financial considerations may influence how brands are displayed. Not all brands are included. [Learn more](https://money.com/page/disclaimer/). ![New York residents from Manhattan, Long Island, New Paltz, White Plains, Rochester, Syracuse, Ithaca, and Binghamton gathered together at the New york State Capitol in Albany on March 8th, to rally and lobby their legislators to make GMO labeling the law in New York State.](https://img.money.com/2016/03/160316_em_gmolabeling.jpg) *New York residents from Manhattan, Long Island, New Paltz, White Plains, Rochester, Syracuse, Ithaca, and Binghamton gathered together at the New york State Capitol in Albany on March 8th, to rally and lobby their legislators to make GMO labeling the law in New York State.* A Senate vote today ensured that any GMO labeling laws passed at the state level can remain in place and won't be supplanted by nationwide, voluntary guidelines for manufacturers to follow. The legislation in question, an amendment to another bill sarcastically dubbed the "DARK Act" by [critics](https://consumerist.com/2016/03/16/senate-votes-down-bill-that-would-have-overturned-states-gmo-labeling-laws/), would have prohibited states from going ahead and making their own laws about GMO labeling. Proponents of the amendment said a "patchwork" of regulations would be an expensive headache for food manufacturers, who would just push the costs onto consumers. [Opponents](http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/976/ge-food-labeling/state-labeling-initiatives) said since Congress won't act, states should be able to decide what their governments want to do about the current dearth of labeling, and implement rules as they see fit. Critics of GMO foods were heartened by the result of today's vote, which split mostly along party lines (Democrats against the bill, Republicans for it), although there were some defectors on both sides. "Consumers have a right to know what they are eating,” Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives for Consumers Union, said in a [statement](https://consumerist.com/2016/03/16/senate-votes-down-bill-that-would-have-overturned-states-gmo-labeling-laws/). "Labeling that provides consumers with the information they want about whether their food is genetically engineered​ is the only answer." Even in today's political climate, few things are more contentious than the issue of genetically modified food and whether or not consumers are helped or hurt by rules that require labeling it as such. A decision (a bipartisan one, no less!) by the Senate today ensured that, while the status quo for labeling remains unchanged, the debate will continue to go on. One recent [poll](https://consumerist.com/2015/12/02/poll-9-in-10-americans-support-gmo-labeling/) funded by consumer advocacy groups said 90% of Americans want GMO foods to be labeled, but [opponents](http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/04/dr-oz-says-he-just-wants-to-label-gmo-foods.html) say GMO ingredients are safe and shouldn't be unfairly stigmatized by labels calling them out. ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://money.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Economy and Politics", "item": "https://money.com/economy-and-politics/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Consumer Rights", "item": "https://money.com/consumer-rights/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "State GMO Labeling Laws Can Remain in Place" } ] }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://money.com/#website", "url": "https://money.com", "name": "Money", "publisher": { "@id": "https://money.com/#organization" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/#webpage", "url": "https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/", "name": "State GMO Labeling Laws Can Remain in Place", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://money.com/#website" }, "datePublished": "2016-03-16T20:26:21.000Z", "mainEntity": { "@id": "https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/" }, "inLanguage": "en-US", "breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/#breadcrumb" }, "dateModified": "2016-03-16T20:26:21.000Z" }, { "@type": "Article", "headline": "State GMO Labeling Laws Can Remain in Place", "articleSection": "Economy and Politics", "image": [ { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://img.money.com/2016/03/160316_em_gmolabeling.jpg", "width": 2100, "height": 1402, "caption": "160316_EM_GMOLabeling" } ], "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Martha C. White", "url": "https://money.com/author/martha-c-white/", "@id": "https://money.com/author/martha-c-white/#author", "image": "https://img.money.com/2014/01/martha.png?w=350&h=430&crop=1", "jobTitle": "Writer", "alumniOf": "BA, English, Princeton University", "worksFor": { "@id": "https://money.com/#organization" } } ], "publisher": "https://money.com/#organization", "datePublished": "2016-03-16T20:26:21.000Z", "description": "The Senate voted against a bill that would have stopped states from mandating GMO labeling on food.", "abstract": "The Senate voted against a bill that would have stopped states from mandating GMO labeling on food.", "@id": "https://money.com/state-gmo-labeling-laws-senate-ruling/", "inLanguage": "en-US", "dateModified": "2016-03-16T20:26:21.000Z", "wordCount": 292, "keywords": [ "food label", "food labeling", "GMO", "gmo foods", "GMOs", "pubdesk" ], "about": [ { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Political economy", "sameAs": [ "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_economy" ] }, { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Consumer protection", "sameAs": [ "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection" ] } ] } ] } ```