Find Out

Many companies featured on Money advertise with us. Opinions are our own, but compensation and
in-depth research determine where and how companies may appear. Learn more about how we make money.

By Alicia Adamczyk
September 26, 2016
US-VOTE-POLL-TRUMP-CLINTON
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
AFP—AFP/Getty Images

For many voters, their primary concern of the 2016 election is which candidate will be better for an economy. Can Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton reinvigorate a sluggish economy, or will Republican nominee Donald Trump “Make America Great Again”?

A new study from WalletHub analyzed economic indicators such as GDP growth and annual poverty rate change under each presidential administration from 1950 and 2015. In another vote for the importance of bipartisanship, WalletHub determined that the economy has performed best overall with a Democratic president and a Republican Congress.

Read Next: Hillary Clinton’s Bid for the Economic Hearts of the Middle Class

It may seem strange given Washington’s current state of gridlock, but WalletHub’s report found that the stock market, poverty rates, income growth, and national debt as percentage of GDP all perform better with a Dem in the Oval Office and a Republican-controlled Congress.

Read Next: How to Watch Tonight’s Presidential Debate Without Cable

If you’re worried about whether a Democratic or Republican presidential candidate will adversely impact your financial well-being, take a deep breath. As Money reported, stocks generally rise no matter who’s in office. The biggest factor impacting your investment portfolio is how you react to the outcome of the election. As my colleague Taylor Tepper wrote, “the S&P 500 index has finished up in more than two-thirds of all calendar years since 1926, a period that’s seen eight Republican and seven Democratic Presidents.”